WiFi穩定度原來那麼差喔
PING 192.168.2.123 (192.168.2.123) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.2.123: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=2.50 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.2.123: icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=10.2 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.2.123: icmp_seq=3 ttl=128 time=2.21 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.2.123: icmp_seq=4 ttl=128 time=5.45 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.2.123: icmp_seq=5 ttl=128 time=3.66 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.2.123: icmp_seq=6 ttl=128 time=1.97 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.2.123: icmp_seq=7 ttl=128 time=6.07 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.2.123: icmp_seq=8 ttl=128 time=2.19 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.2.123: icmp_seq=9 ttl=128 time=5.94 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.2.123: icmp_seq=10 ttl=128 time=2.08 ms
—- 192.168.2.123 ping statistics —-
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9006ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.978/4.231/10.205/2.544 ms
PING 192.168.2.5 (192.168.2.5) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.2.5: icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=0.526 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.2.5: icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=0.857 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.2.5: icmp_seq=3 ttl=128 time=0.317 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.2.5: icmp_seq=4 ttl=128 time=0.381 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.2.5: icmp_seq=5 ttl=128 time=0.423 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.2.5: icmp_seq=6 ttl=128 time=0.370 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.2.5: icmp_seq=7 ttl=128 time=0.333 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.2.5: icmp_seq=8 ttl=128 time=0.362 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.2.5: icmp_seq=9 ttl=128 time=0.378 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.2.5: icmp_seq=10 ttl=128 time=0.359 ms
—- 192.168.2.5 ping statistics —-
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 8998ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.317/0.430/0.857/0.154 ms